Slot Comparison
Put two or three slots side by side and see what actually differs: RTP, volatility, max win, bonus buy price and the payout the community has measured.
Pick two slots and the table below fills itself. The three headline numbers answer three different questions, and a slot that wins on one of them often loses on another.
| Figure | Outlanders realm of LegendsJP |
|---|---|
| Artwork |  |
| RTP | 96.25% |
| Volatility | High |
| Max Win | 395,485x |
| Bonus buy from | - |
| Release Date | 2026 |
| Playable demo | No |
| Community RTP | - |
Every slot series in the catalogue
These are the games whose names say they belong together - a base game and the parts that followed it. Each card lists the members with their RTP and max win; one click loads a series into the comparison above.
gates of olympus
- Gates of Olympus96.5% · 5,000x
- Gates of Olympus 100096.5% · 15,000x
- Gates of Olympus Super Scatter96.5% · 50,000x
- Gates of Olympus Xmas 100096.5% · 15,000x
sweet bonanza
- Sweet Bonanza96.51% · 21,100x
- Sweet Bonanza 100096.53% · 25,000x
- Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter96.51% · 50,000x
- Sweet Bonanza Xmas96.5% · 21,100x
5 lions
- 5 Lions96.5% · 3,520x
- 5 Lions Megaways96.5% · 5,000x
- 5 Lions Megaways 296.5% · 8,000x
airstrike
- Airstrike96.34% · 50,000x
- Airstrike 296.01% · 100,000x
- Airstrike 396.01% · 100,000x
alien fruits
- Alien Fruits96% · 15,000x
- Alien Fruits 297.17% · 5,000x
- Alien Fruits 397% · 10,000x
aztec gems
- Aztec Gems96.52% · 375x
- Aztec Gems Deluxe96.5% · 22,500x
- Aztec Gems Megaways96.58% · 10,000x
big bass bonanza
- Big Bass Bonanza96.7% · 2,100x
- Big Bass Bonanza 100096.51% · 20,000x
- Big Bass Bonanza Megaways96.7% · 4,000x
big bass halloween
- Big Bass Halloween96.04% · 2,100x
- Big Bass Halloween 296.71% · 5,000x
- Big Bass Halloween 396.5% · 5,000x
chaos crew
- Chaos Crew96.3% · 10,000x
- Chaos Crew 296.27% · 20,000x
- Chaos Crew 396.18% · 30,000x
great rhino
- Great Rhino96.5% · -
- Great Rhino Deluxe96.5% · -
- Great Rhino Megaways96.5% · 20,000x
midas golden touch
- Midas Golden Touch96.1% · -
- Midas Golden Touch 294.27% · 15,000x
- Midas Golden Touch 394.16% · 10,000x
How to read the comparison
RTP, volatility and max win are not three versions of the same statement. RTP is what a slot pays back over a run long enough that the number means anything at all, and the gap between two slots is usually a fraction of a percent. Volatility says how that return arrives: a low-volatility slot pays small and often, a high-volatility one pays rarely and large, and both can carry the same RTP. Max win is the ceiling, and it is the number that says the least about an ordinary session - most players never come close to it, which is exactly why it is the number most often quoted.
The same name does not mean the same game. Measured across our catalogue in September 2026, two parts of one series are no closer in volatility than two randomly drawn slots from the same studio, and their max win differs by a factor of two on average. Waylanders Forge and Waylanders Cup share a name and almost nothing else: 98.00 against 96.70 RTP, high against medium volatility, 80,085 against 100,000 max win. A sequel inherits the theme and the artwork far more reliably than it inherits the mathematics.
The community RTP column is empty for most slots, and that is the honest state rather than a gap we forgot to fill. It is built from the bet archives players upload, and a payout estimate needs a great many rounds before it stops being noise: below 25,000 rounds the range around the estimate is wider than the difference between any two slots you might be comparing. Where the column shows a round count instead of a percentage, the data exists but has not reached that floor. Where it shows a percentage, enough rounds have been measured for the number to carry weight.
What this tool does not do is tell you which slot is better. That depends on what you are playing for, how long you intend to play and what a session is worth to you, and no table can settle it. Two slots with identical figures can feel completely different to play, because the mechanics behind the numbers - how a bonus is triggered, how often it is worth buying, how the multipliers stack - are not in any of these columns. Use the demo where there is one.
Questions about comparing slots
Not on its own. RTP is a long-run average, and the difference between two slots is typically a few hundredths of a percent - far smaller than the swing of a single session. A slot with 96.5% RTP and low volatility and one with 96.5% RTP and very high volatility return the same amount over time while offering entirely different experiences. Read RTP together with volatility, never instead of it.
It changes the distribution, not the average. High volatility means long stretches without a meaningful win followed by rare large ones; low volatility means frequent small returns. For the same stake and the same RTP, a high-volatility slot burns through a balance faster and more often, and it is also the only kind that can produce the outsized wins people post.
Because it is measured, not copied from the provider. The figure comes from bet archives that players upload themselves, and an estimate only becomes meaningful above roughly 25,000 recorded rounds. Most slots in the catalogue have fewer, so the column shows the round count instead of a number that would pretend to be settled.
Less often than the name suggests. Across the series in our catalogue, two parts of the same series are no more alike in volatility than two random slots from the same studio, and their max win differs by around a factor of two. The theme carries over; the mathematics frequently does not. Comparing the parts is worth the effort precisely because the name is not a reliable guide.
Yes. Two is the default because most comparisons are between a pair, and because two columns stay readable on a phone. A third can be added, and on a narrow screen the table scrolls sideways rather than squeezing the columns to nothing.
Yes - the selection is in the address, so copying the URL shares exactly what you are looking at. Those links are deliberately kept out of search results; only the page itself is indexed, which is why you may not find a particular pairing by searching for it.